Marx’s Theory of Money in Historical Perspective
نویسنده
چکیده
The paper considers two problems related to Marx’s theory of money: first, the definition and measurement of the quantity of social labor time represented by a unit of money; second, the application of Marx’s commodity-money theory to contemporary monetary institutions based on state-credit money. In theory social labor time and the price expression of exchange value emerge simultaneously, so that no ex ante measure of social labor time is possible. In practice adjustments of social labor time through weighting to account for the characteristics of workers or by relative wages, or the assumption of uniform proportions of concrete labor across sectors can illuminate the determinants of profitability. State-credit moneys are analyzed through Marx’s concept of fictitious capital, leading to a critique of the neoclassical view of the value of money as a bubble. The paper concludes with a discussion of the dilemmas involved in the application of Marx’s theory of money to contemporary world monetary
منابع مشابه
Endogeneity of Money and the State in Marx’s theory of Non-commodity Money
Moseley and Saros’s MELT in case of inconvertible paper money In developing Marx’s non-commodity theory of money which is largely an uncultivated area in Marxian economics, one of the crucial issues at stake is to establish the monetary expression of labour time (MELT) in case of inconvertible paper money consistently with Marx’s theory in general and not rejecting his labour theory of value in...
متن کاملInside the capital circuit: what money is and what it does
One view, argued by Williams (2000), is that Marx simply made a ‘category mistake’ when he introduced commodity money into his theory of value. If money is fully determined by its social functions in capitalism then the physical characteristics assumed by money become historically contingent so that ‘commodity-money is necessary neither to the logic of Marx’s system nor to the logic of capitali...
متن کاملThe “Macro-monetary” Interpretation of Marx’s Theory: A Reply to Ravagnani’s Critique
This paper responds to Ravagnani’s critique of my “macro-monetary” interpretation of Marx’s theory. The first section briefly reviews the key points of my interpretation, with special emphasis on the determination of the initial inputs of constant capital and variable capital. The second section replies to Ravagnani’s criticism that my interpretation is subject to a severe “analytical limitatio...
متن کاملMarx’s objections to credit theories of money
right, or the power of demanding services in general, which may, or may not be commodities’ (Ibid: 35). The most advanced form of such transferable debt had no intrinsic value, typically paper, so the intrinsic value of silver or gold as money was ‘secondary’ (Ibid: 45). Gold and silver were only the most civilised of a lineage of representatives of labour, including shells and chocolate — clea...
متن کاملMarx’s Value Theory Revisited. A ‘Value-form’ Approach
ion, is only possible as such an abstraction, as soon as money is posited’ (Marx 1993:
متن کامل